<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Materialism Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therationalgod.com/2007/12/materialism-philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therationalgod.com/2007/12/materialism-philosophy/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 14:18:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cafedog</title>
		<link>http://www.therationalgod.com/2007/12/materialism-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>cafedog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 03:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therationalgod.wordpress.com/2007/12/16/materialism-philosophy/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>to me dawkins seems to stuck in Cause-and effect science to make any substantial statement on god and universe at large. Personally I still hold to field theory.
I am glad i found your wonderful blog on pan-theism. still taking it in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to me dawkins seems to stuck in Cause-and effect science to make any substantial statement on god and universe at large. Personally I still hold to field theory.<br />
I am glad i found your wonderful blog on pan-theism. still taking it in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thoughtintoaction</title>
		<link>http://www.therationalgod.com/2007/12/materialism-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>thoughtintoaction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therationalgod.wordpress.com/2007/12/16/materialism-philosophy/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>This same thing came to mind as I reviewed the recent works of rambling atheists.  To to be philosophical materialist is to say you don&#039;t believe in mathematics.  If you believe in mathematics even though you cannot see, touch, feel, taste or smell it then you are not a philosophical materialist and should not present yourself as one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This same thing came to mind as I reviewed the recent works of rambling atheists.  To to be philosophical materialist is to say you don&#8217;t believe in mathematics.  If you believe in mathematics even though you cannot see, touch, feel, taste or smell it then you are not a philosophical materialist and should not present yourself as one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
