Recent Comments

• It's amazing that the religious will try anything to discredit the athiests or agnostics of the world. One of the main ...
  Kiplar | 4Aug08 | More
• I have enjoyed reading about the Rational God on the website but that also raised a lot questions I had ...
  zungus3 | 24Apr08 | More
• to me dawkins seems to stuck in Cause-and effect science to make any substantial statement on god and universe at ...
  cafedog | 11Jan08 | More
• bit new at this - so if you reply, please let me know at rafa@blueyonder.co.uk
  ikbol | 9Jan08 | More
• There should ideally be a double definition of monism. You are talking about "substantive monism". There should also be a ...
  ikbol | 9Jan08 | More
• This same thing came to mind as I reviewed the recent works of rambling atheists. To to be philosophical ...
  thoughtintoaction | 16Dec07 | More
• Jpmanzi, The answers to your questions would probably depend on who you were talking to. I think the phrase "scientific pantheism" ...
  therationalgod | 10Nov07 | More
• Geez, Took me forever to find your site again. Accidently deleted it off the blogroll. I really need to ...
  jpmanzi | 6Nov07 | More
• interesting observation.
  tougar | 28Oct07 | More
• Very interesting and enlightening. Thank you... I've been trying to find that "clear daylight". I'm abandoning theism yet ...
  comingoutoftheprayercloset | 16Oct07 | More